Ability to Vote for Single Party on Ballot (June 2017)
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
category | Total |
---|---|
Good idea | 44% |
Bad idea | 34% |
Don't know/No opinion | 22% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Measurement of Party ID for this figure is based on two questions. First, respondents were asked whether they consider themselves to be a Democrats, Republicans, independents, other, or not sure. Those who responded that they are independents or "other" were then asked if they lean toward either the Democrats or Republicans. If they indicated that they lean toward one party or the other, they are considered Democrats or Republicans for the purposes of this figure. Only "pure" independents or members of a third party who indicate that they have no preference for Democrats vis-a-vis Republicans are considered independents . Respondents who answered that they are "not sure" for either of the two aforementioned questions are not incorporated into this figure.
category | Democrat | Independent | Republican |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 41% | 15% | 54% |
Bad idea | 33% | 57% | 29% |
Don't know/No opinion | 26% | 29% | 17% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
category | Lean Democrat | Not very strong Democrat | Strong Democrat |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 28% | 29% | 55% |
Bad idea | 50% | 37% | 21% |
Don't know/No opinion | 22% | 34% | 24% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
category | Lean Republican | Not very strong Republican | Strong Republican |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 47% | 46% | 64% |
Bad idea | 33% | 37% | 20% |
Don't know/No opinion | 19% | 17% | 16% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Ideology is measured on a scale of 1-7, with 1 corresponding to "extremely liberal", 7 corresponding to "extremely conservative, and 4 corresponding to "in the middle." For the purposes of this table, respondents who placed themselves at or between points 1 and 3 on the scale are considered "liberal," respondents who placed themselves at point 4 on the scale are considered "moderate," and respondents who placed themselves at or between points 5 and 7 on the scale are considered conservative.
category | Liberals | Moderates | Conservatives |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 41% | 33% | 52% |
Bad idea | 39% | 34% | 29% |
Don't know/No opinion | 21% | 33% | 19% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
category | Leaning liberal | Somewhat liberal | Extremely liberal |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 30% | 46% | 45% |
Bad idea | 51% | 34% | 33% |
Don't know/No opinion | 19% | 20% | 23% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
category | Leaning conservative | Somewhat conservative | Extremely conservative |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 46% | 51% | 56% |
Bad idea | 33% | 31% | 24% |
Don't know/No opinion | 21% | 17% | 20% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Tea Party identification is based on the following question, also asked in the survey: "Suppose the Tea Party movement organized itself as a political party. When thinking about the next election for Congress, would you vote for the Republican candidate from your district, the Democratic candidate from your district, or the Tea Party candidate from your district?" Those who responded "Republican candidate" are considered Republicans (non-Tea Party movement) and those who responded "Tea Party candidate" are considered Tea Party Republicans.
category | Democrat | Republican | Tea Party |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 44% | 59% | 54% |
Bad idea | 34% | 25% | 30% |
Don't know/No opinion | 22% | 17% | 16% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Race is calculated according to the race variable.
category | White | Black | Hispanic |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 48% | 37% | 38% |
Bad idea | 33% | 33% | 36% |
Don't know/No opinion | 19% | 30% | 25% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Gender is calculated according to the GENDER variable.
category | Male | Female |
---|---|---|
Good idea | 42% | 46% |
Bad idea | 40% | 28% |
Don't know/No opinion | 18% | 26% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Community is based on the following question, " Would you say that you live in an urban, suburban, or rural community?"
category | Urban | Suburban | Rural |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 43% | 45% | 45% |
Bad idea | 30% | 35% | 35% |
Don't know/No opinion | 27% | 20% | 20% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Age is calculated according to the AGEG variable.
category | 18-29 | 30-44 | 45-64 | 65+ |
---|---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 34% | 41% | 47% | 49% |
Bad idea | 42% | 34% | 33% | 29% |
Don't know/No opinion | 24% | 25% | 20% | 22% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?"
Education is calculated according to the EDUC variable.
category | No high school | High school graduate | Some college | 2-year | 4-year | Post-grad |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 32% | 46% | 41% | 41% | 47% | 44% |
Bad idea | 48% | 27% | 39% | 33% | 31% | 38% |
Don't know/No opinion | 20% | 27% | 20% | 25% | 21% | 19% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?" Religiosity is calculated according to the IMPORT variable.
category | Extremely important | Somewhat important | Not very important | Not at all important |
---|---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 53% | 42% | 33% | 34% |
Bad idea | 25% | 34% | 51% | 40% |
Don't know/No opinion | 22% | 24% | 17% | 26% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, "In Texas, voters can choose to vote for all of the candidates of a party at once instead of having to vote for each candidate individually. Do you think being able to vote for all the candidates of a single party at once is a good idea, or is it a bad idea?" Fundamentalism is calculated according to the LITERAL variable.
category | The Bible is the word of God, to be taken literally | The Bible is the word of God, not to be taken literally | The Bible is a book written by men |
---|---|---|---|
Good idea | 55% | 46% | 35% |
Bad idea | 22% | 35% | 43% |
Don't know/No opinion | 24% | 19% | 22% |