Hillary Clinton Favorability (June 2016)

Hillary Clinton Favorability (June 2016)

  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."

Loading chart...
categorycolumn-1
Very favorable16%
Somewhat favorable13%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable9%
Somewhat unfavorable8%
Very unfavorable51%
Don't know/no opinion3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Measurement of Party ID for this figure is based on two questions. First, respondents were asked whether they consider themselves to be a Democrats, Republicans, independents, other, or not sure. Those who responded that they are independents or "other" were then asked if they lean toward either the Democrats or Republicans. If they indicated that they lean toward one party or the other, they are considered Democrats or Republicans for the purposes of this figure. Only "pure" independents or members of a third party who indicate that they have no preference for Democrats vis-a-vis Republicans are considered independents. Respondents who answered that they are "not sure" for either of the two aforementioned questions are not incorporated into this figure.
Loading chart...
categoryDemocratIndependentRepublican
Very favorable38%5%3%
Somewhat favorable29%8%1%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable12%14%4%
Somewhat unfavorable8%8%6%
Very unfavorable11%59%85%
Don't know/no opinion2%6%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
Loading chart...
categoryLean RepublicanNot very strong RepublicanStrong Republican
Very favorable3%4%2%
Somewhat favorable0%4%1%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable3%9%0%
Somewhat unfavorable8%7%3%
Very unfavorable87%71%93%
Don't know/no opinion0%5%0%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
Loading chart...
categoryLean DemocratNot very strong DemocratStrong Democrat
Very favorable23%24%54%
Somewhat favorable22%34%29%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable19%15%8%
Somewhat unfavorable14%10%4%
Very unfavorable21%15%3%
Don't know/no opinion1%1%2%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Ideology is measured on a scale of 1-7, with 1 corresponding to "extremely liberal", 7 corresponding to "extremely conservative, and 4 corresponding to "in the middle." For the purposes of this table, respondents who placed themselves at or between points 1 and 3 on the scale are considered "liberal," respondents who placed themselves at point 4 on the scale are considered "moderate," and respondents who placed themselves at or between points 5 and 7 on the scale are considered conservative.
Loading chart...
categoryLiberalsModeratesConservatives
Very favorable35%21%5%
Somewhat favorable30%18%1%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable9%12%6%
Somewhat unfavorable9%11%5%
Very unfavorable16%31%84%
Don't know/no opinion1%7%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
Loading chart...
categoryLeaning conservativeSomewhat conservativeExtremely conservative
Very favorable4%2%10%
Somewhat favorable2%1%1%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable8%5%3%
Somewhat unfavorable12%3%1%
Very unfavorable74%88%85%
Don't know/no opinion0%1%0%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
Loading chart...
categoryLeaning liberalSomewhat liberalExtremely liberal
Very favorable29%37%40%
Somewhat favorable37%27%29%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable8%13%3%
Somewhat unfavorable9%6%15%
Very unfavorable18%17%11%
Don't know/no opinion0%0%3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Tea Party identification is based on the following question, also asked in the survey: "Suppose the Tea Party movement organized itself as a political party. When thinking about the next election for Congress, would you vote for the Republican candidate from your district, the Democratic candidate from your district, or the Tea Party candidate from your district?" Those who responded "Republican candidate" are considered Republicans (non-Tea Party movement) and those who responded "Tea Party candidate" are considered Tea Party Republicans.
Loading chart...
categoryDemocratRepublicanTea Party
Very favorable39%3%3%
Somewhat favorable28%3%4%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable13%6%1%
Somewhat unfavorable10%6%1%
Very unfavorable8%82%90%
Don't know/no opinion2%0%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Race is calculated according to the race variable.
Loading chart...
categoryWhiteBlackHispanic
Very favorable8%44%23%
Somewhat favorable10%21%18%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable5%14%15%
Somewhat unfavorable8%7%7%
Very unfavorable68%11%30%
Don't know/no opinion2%3%7%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Gender is calculated according to the GENDER variable.
Loading chart...
categoryMaleFemale
Very favorable15%18%
Somewhat favorable12%13%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable7%10%
Somewhat unfavorable6%9%
Very unfavorable56%47%
Don't know/no opinion3%3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Community is based on the following question, "Would you say that you live in an urban, suburban, or rural community?"
Loading chart...
categoryUrbanSuburbanRural
Very favorable24%14%9%
Somewhat favorable16%12%10%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable7%10%8%
Somewhat unfavorable10%8%6%
Very unfavorable38%54%64%
Don't know/no opinion5%2%3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Age is calculated according to the AGEG variable.
Loading chart...
category18-2930-4445-6465+
Very favorable15%16%16%20%
Somewhat favorable8%16%13%11%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable15%7%9%4%
Somewhat unfavorable15%12%5%2%
Very unfavorable41%43%55%63%
Don't know/no opinion6%5%2%0%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton."
    Education is calculated according to the EDUC variable.
Loading chart...
categoryNo high schoolHigh school graduateSome college2-year4-yearPost-grad
Very favorable16%17%13%29%15%13%
Somewhat favorable13%9%12%13%15%17%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable16%11%8%10%4%5%
Somewhat unfavorable9%5%7%11%9%9%
Very unfavorable41%52%56%36%55%54%
Don't know/no opinion3%5%4%1%2%2%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton." Religiosity is calculated according to the IMPORT variable.
Loading chart...
categoryExtremely importantSomewhat importantNot very importantNot at all important
Very favorable19%15%11%14%
Somewhat favorable9%14%16%19%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable7%11%7%11%
Somewhat unfavorable6%10%8%9%
Very unfavorable56%47%54%43%
Don't know/no opinion3%4%4%3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Respondents were asked, "Please tell us whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, neither favorable nor unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton." Fundamentalism is calculated according to the LITERAL variable.
Loading chart...
categoryThe Bible is the word of God, to be taken literallyThe Bible is the word of God, not to be taken literallyThe Bible is a book written by men
Very favorable21%13%19%
Somewhat favorable10%11%20%
Neither favorable nor unfavorable6%7%10%
Somewhat unfavorable8%8%8%
Very unfavorable51%57%41%
Don't know/no opinion4%3%2%

Latest Poll News

June 2023 University of Texas/Texas Politics Project Poll

The June 2023 University of Texas / Texas Politics Project poll included extensive questioning about the performance of state leaders during the 2023 Legislative session.
State on the Wrong Track

For only the second time in UT polling, but the second time in less than a year, a majority of Texas voters say that the state is on the wrong track.
Inflation on Texans' minds

More than half of Texans think the state is on the wrong track, while border security and immigration continue to loom large, especially among Texas Republicans.
June 2021 University of Texas/Texas Tribune Poll

The latest University of Texas/Texas Tribune poll has been released in full. Check out the latest poll page to explore results related to the 87th legislative session, the coronavirus pandemic, assessments of state leaders, and more.
March 2021 Texas Politics Project/UT Energy Institute Poll

The Texas Politics Project just released the results of a March poll developed in conjunction with a team of researchers at the UT Energy Institute that asked dozens of questions about Texans’ experience during the winter storm, their attitudes toward causes and consequences of the storm, their views of, and expectations about, possible policy responses, and their views of how a wide range of actors from their neighbors and utility providers to state political leaders, regulatory bodies, and corporate actors. 

Related Results